Question free essay sample

According to Jarvis, the reason for the reaction mainly due to two points. First, there were secret police of the Nazis and the East Germany. People of Germany were living in a condition with very little privacy. So they treasure the freedom they are enjoying. The reason that Germans do not trust Google is that Google is a company of great size and making a lot of money. And they do not an American company making money on them by the Google street view. (Part B) According to Jarvis, constraining Google to take photos of a public place would somehow redefine the meaning of public. As it is a common understanding that public is own by every person, which includes Google, Google should have the right to use it. Restricting Google street view will set up a bad precedent. There may be case that stopping the publicity of photo or video of some people doing bad acts in public places. We will write a custom essay sample on Question or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If privacy is defined in this way, public will never be shared. Privacy would easily be taken as an excuse to stop anything to show to the public. And the right of public would be declined. Scandal and injustice would easily be covered from the public. First, people can’t control the usage ad the publicity of the photo they are. Every body in the world could see he/she in the photo. The number of people who can reach the photo is unlimited. Also, any other company for other promotion may use the picture. Second, the camera may capture the picture inside the house if your door and windows are not closed. As people are feeling safe in their own places, they may be doing something not appropriate. These actions are not supposed to be captured and showed to the world. (Part C) I agree that such devices should be banned in some circumstances. For example, when on the public street, I think that it is acceptable to use Google glass. Similar to the case for the Google street view, the street is a public place that own by everyone, so it is all right to take picture and video, even when somebody are captured in these. This is slightly different from the street view as the chances of accidently capturing private indoor location is lower and the video will not be shown to everyone in the world. For this case, content that is accidently filmed from indoor would be considered as privacy. The use of the product of the photos or video would be the factor, when the video or photo would be watched by the whole world likes the Google street view, it should be consider as the privacy of the people being captured. Finally, how personal is the action they are doing. If the actions were not supposed to be watched by other (For example, bathing indoor), it should be considered as the privacy of that person. When In a restaurant, the situation is similar to that on a street. And as the person would be sitting on his own desk eating alone or with friends, the chances of capturing unwanted part would be lower. So it is acceptable for someone to use Google glass when they are having their meal. And it is not easy to establish a consistent view because most of the content will be filming people and food. And for Cinema, it would be obvious that these devices have to be banned. The devices can record the whole movie, which is illegal. Someone may record the movie and show it to other in order to watch the film without paying for the tickets. This will result in a great loss of income of the movie company. So the devices must be banned in every cinema. The illegality of recording the video would be the factors. It is not acceptable to record the movie. This is a simple and powerful law to judge weather it is consider as the privacy of the company. Question free essay sample The indispensable opposition uses examples of to develop his argument. In the first paragraph the author started off with expressing what liberty of opinion means to him and to other people as well. He mentions how political freedom- that is to say, the right to speak freely and to act in opposition-.. In the third paragraph he mentions that opinion is a luxury he said this because we tend to not speak for ourselves only because we Just learn how to tolerate those around us because they too have rights.This matters cause in this paragraph he states his point of view, and this is how he forms his In paragraph four, the author used a historic fact to support his argument. Argument. This is essentially important because he knows that people will question as to why he only used his opinion. He mentions freedom of speech, and as a matter of practical human experience there is much more compelling reason for cultivating the habits of free men. We will write a custom essay sample on Question or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As a conclusion our author concluded that as of right now, he believes that we missed the true of meaning of having the freedom to speak or ourselves, because often times we tend to tolerate another beings annoying doing, Just like when a baby next door Is crying, we tend to Just let it go, or even when a neighbor is playing a loud music, the author also believes that this is an act of laziness and lack of strong serious conviction, he believes that humanity needs a little push when it comes to speaking and standing up for themselves, or ourselves.He also believes that some shouldnt take It too far as to where we offend people, he believes we need to balance. This Is how Lifespan supported his argument about freedom.